modern era

Consequentialism Main article: Consequentialism Consequentialism refers to moral theories that hold that the consequences of a particular action form the basis for any valid moral judgment about that action (or create a structure for judgment, see rule consequentialism). Thus, from a consequentialist standpoint, a morally right action is one that produces a good outcome, or consequence. This view is often expressed as the aphorism "The ends justify the means". The term … [Read more...]

Meta-ethical questions

Meta-ethical questions According to Richard Garner and Bernard Rosen,[1] there are three kinds of meta-ethical problems, or three general questions: What is the meaning of moral terms or judgments? What is the nature of moral judgments? How may moral judgments be supported or defended? A question of the first type might be, "What do the words 'good', 'bad', 'right' and 'wrong' mean?" (see value theory). The second category includes questions of whether moral judgments are … [Read more...]

Normative Ethics

Foot

Normative ethics is the branch of philosophical ethics that investigates the set of questions that arise when considering “how ought one to act, morally speaking?” Normative ethics is distinct from meta-ethics because it examines standards for the rightness and wrongness of actions, while meta-ethics studies the meaning of moral language and the metaphysics of moral facts. Normative ethics is also distinct from descriptive ethics, as the latter is an empirical investigation of people’s … [Read more...]